Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Will the Theologians Please Sit Down  /  Chapter 17: Commentaries that Muffle God's Word  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 10
The chapter ends: “dead theologians like Augustine, Calvin, and Luther still rule the church from their graves”; where do you see that rule operating in your own tradition (in assumptions about grace, obedience, assurance, freedom, or “what Jesus really meant”), and what concrete changes would be required for Jesus’ commands to regain first place even if it makes you feel unsafe or out of step with evangelical norms?
Another way to ask: The chapter says dead theologians still control the church. Where do you see that in your tradition (grace, obedience, assurance, freedom, or “what Jesus really meant”), and what real changes would it take to put Jesus’ commands first even if it feels risky or unpopular?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t name specific modern traditions, but it describes “rule from the grave” as relying on Calvin/Augustine/Luther through commentaries and preaching that explain away Jesus when His words feel too radical. Concrete change, in Bercot’s framing, would mean making Jesus’ commands the baseline and refusing interpretive moves that dismiss literal obedience as “nitpicking.”

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says Calvin’s commentaries, spread by the printing press, shaped what “evangelical pulpits” preached so that it was “Calvin’s thoughts, not those of Jesus.”
  • He accuses Calvin of having “no hesitancy to explain away Jesus’ words” to fit his “Christo-Judaic system.”
  • Examples of “what Jesus really meant” overrides: oaths reinterpreted as allowed when “necessity demands it”; nonresistance dismissed as “nitpicking about words”; love of enemies reduced to “no new laws,” enabling war.
  • In commentaries, Bercot shows copycat repetition (“virtually every commentator ever since”) and calls it “blind leading the blind.”
  • He concludes explicitly: “dead theologians…still rule the church from their graves.”
Discussion Follow-ups What teachings in your setting are defended mainly by “that’s not what Jesus meant”? What practices would change if you treated Jesus’ words as the final authority even when they feel unsafe?

Jumpstarter 10 of 10
Back Questions Done