Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 1

David Bercot says that after Nicaea the church’s center of gravity shifted from Jesus’ words “Follow me” to “Study me”; what do you think gets lost when “study” becomes the focus, and what kinds of spiritual habits or church cultures does that shift naturally produce?

Another way to ask: If the church shifts from “Follow Jesus” to mostly “Study Jesus,” what gets lost? What kinds of habits or church culture does that shift create?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, what gets lost is real discipleship—an obedient relationship with Jesus that produces Christlike fruit. When “study” replaces “follow,” the church naturally forms a culture of head knowledge, theological camps, and even coercion rather than inward transformation.

Support from Transcript:

Bercot says after Nicaea the institutional church shifted from Jesus’ “Follow me” to “Study me,” and calls that “a real problem.”
He defines “Doctrine Anity” as requiring “no real relationship with Christ and no fruit,” but “only a change in our heads, not a change in our hearts.”
He says this kind of religion can be embraced by a Pharisee—suggesting it fits a mindset focused on correctness rather than repentance.
He connects the theological conflicts (Catholics vs. Arians) with being “devoid of the Spirit of Christ,” implying that intense study and debate didn’t produce Christlike behavior.
He describes a church culture where people believe “the essence of Christianity was theology, not an obedient love-faith relationship with Christ,” and where church-state unity and persecution seemed acceptable.

Discussion Follow-ups What practices in your church most clearly communicate “follow Jesus” rather than merely “learn about Jesus”? How could study be reconnected to obedience and fruit?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 1 of 10