Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 9
Bercot accuses the Nicene theologians of exalting Jesus with their lips while “contradicting his very words,” even claiming they “murdered others” and “corrupted his kingdom”; what modern Christian practices or theological emphases might similarly honor Jesus’ divinity while practically sidelining his commands?
Another way to ask: Bercot says some theologians praised Jesus but ignored what he commanded. What Christian habits today might strongly honor Jesus as God while still pushing his teachings to the side in daily life?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t list modern examples, but Bercot’s principle implies any approach that strongly defends doctrine about Christ while reinterpreting or minimizing Jesus’ clear commands (especially from the Sermon on the Mount) risks repeating the same hypocrisy.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says Nicene theologians “exalted Jesus as highly as possible,” yet “didn’t hesitate to contradict his very words.”
  • His main examples of sidelining commands are reinterpretations of “do not swear at all” and “turn the other cheek.”
  • He says Augustine had “no inhibitions about contradicting his Lord,” turning commands into “suggestion[s].”
  • He generalizes: “They gutted his teachings, corrupted his kingdom… altered the historic faith handed down to them.”
  • He adds they “murdered others,” indicating their theology supported coercive or violent outcomes (though details aren’t given in this excerpt).
  • He concludes they “won the battle” (defeating Arianism) but lost the “war” because Christianity became corrupted.
Discussion Follow-ups Where do we celebrate theological correctness while quietly explaining away Jesus’ costly commands (truthfulness, nonretaliation), and how would we know if we’re doing that?