Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 6
Bercot contrasts Jesus’ “do not swear at all” with Augustine calling oaths “necessary” when people are “slow to believe”; what assumptions about human nature, truth-telling, and the church’s mission are driving Augustine’s reinterpretation, and which set of assumptions sounds closer to the apostolic-age posture?
Another way to ask: Jesus said, “Do not swear at all,” but Augustine said oaths are sometimes “necessary.” What beliefs about people, honesty, and the church’s mission are behind Augustine’s view, and which view seems closer to the apostles’ mindset?

Direct Answer Augustine assumes people are often unwilling to believe without extra guarantees, so oaths become a “necessary” tool for persuasion; Bercot presents the apostolic-age posture as taking Jesus’ command straightforwardly, without carving out necessity-based exceptions.

Support from Transcript:

  • Jesus’ command is quoted as direct: “do not swear at all,” and Bercot calls it “a straightforward commandment.”
  • Bercot says “the early Christians took it literally,” indicating their assumptions favored simple obedience.
  • Augustine says swearing is not “good” but “necessary,” and should be used when “men [are] slow to believe… unless they are assured by an oath.”
  • Augustine reframes “whatsoever is more than these comes from evil” to mean if compelled to swear, it is due to others’ “infirmity.”
  • Bercot interprets Augustine’s effect bluntly: Jesus’ command becomes “a mere suggestion… unless someone insists that you do.”
  • The chapter’s larger critique is that Nicene theologians “didn’t hesitate to contradict his very words,” implying Augustine’s assumptions are out of step with apostolic Christianity.
Discussion Follow-ups Are we more likely to bend Jesus’ words when we prioritize effectiveness (persuasion, credibility) over simple faithfulness?