Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 8
The chapter says “fruit” from an “obedient, love-faith relationship with Christ” no longer carried weight, while someone with “none of the fruit” could be welcomed if he held the creed; where do you see modern Christianity replicating that trade—what kinds of fruitlessness get excused by right doctrinal badges?
Another way to ask: Where do you see churches excusing a lack of Christlike fruit as long as someone has the “right” beliefs or labels?

Direct Answer The transcript’s main point is that after Nicaea, visible obedience and love-based fruit were downgraded, while correct doctrinal alignment (especially with the Nicene Creed) became the main basis for acceptance. It implies that “right badges” can mask a lack of lived discipleship.

Support from Transcript:

  • “The reality that a person bore the fruits from an obedient, love-faith relationship with Christ no longer carried any weight.”
  • “Even though someone bore none of the fruit that comes from a real relationship with Christ, he was still accepted as a Christian… so long as he held to the Nicene Creed.”
  • Bercot summarizes the shift: “Christianity becomes doctrinity.”
  • He connects it to the new post-Nicene message about grace covering wicked living but not theological errors.
  • The creed’s non-biblical term became a required “touchstone of orthodoxy,” reinforcing doctrinal badge-checking.
Discussion Follow-ups Bercot doesn’t list modern examples of “fruitlessness,” so applying it today requires self-examination: what behaviors or lack of obedience do churches tolerate because someone checks the right doctrinal boxes?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next