Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 3

Campbell insists the only bond for “full communion” among Christians is a sincere confession that “Jesus is the Christ,” expressed in an “overt act of obedience,” along with living “conformably to it” and maintaining an “unblemished moral character”; what would it cost (relationally and institutionally) to treat those as your baseline for recognizing a brother or sister?

Another way to ask: Campbell says full communion should be based on confessing “Jesus is the Christ,” obeying Him openly, living it out, and having a clean moral life. What would it cost you—in relationships or church systems—to treat that as the basic test for calling someone a brother or sister?

Direct Answer It would likely cost you some “boundary comfort”: you might have to recognize as brothers and sisters people outside your preferred tradition, while also refusing fellowship where there is blatant moral disobedience—even if the doctrine looks right.

Support from Transcript:

Campbell says the bond of union is “a sincere and hearty conviction…that Jesus is the Christ.”
He adds it must be “exhibited by an overt act of obedience,” implying faith is not merely verbal.
He says a brother is one who “lives conformably to it” and “supports an unblemished moral character.”
Bercot clarifies Campbell is giving the *minimum* to “greet someone as a brother,” not necessarily everything required for close fellowship.
Bercot says he’s “choosy” about joining churches, not mainly over theology, but because many “ignore…Jesus’ explicit commandments” (divorce/remarriage, nonresistance, materialism).

Discussion Follow-ups Would your current church culture be willing to prioritize moral obedience and visible Christ-life over perfect agreement? What relationships might become strained if you did?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 3 of 10