Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Life of the Early Christians  /  Modest Dress & Cosmetics  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 2
In 1 Timothy 2:9 and 1 Peter 3:3, Paul and Peter don’t only mention skin exposure but also braided hair, gold, pearls, and “costly clothing”; what do you think the apostles were trying to protect the church from, and what modern habits (brands, status signals, curated looks) might be the closest equivalents?
Another way to ask: Why do Paul and Peter warn not only about exposed skin but also about braided hair, gold, pearls, and expensive clothes (1 Tim. 2:9; 1 Pet. 3:3)? What modern things—brands, status looks, social media images—match what they were warning about?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests the apostles were protecting the church from attention-seeking display, luxury, and a focus on outward adornment that competes with “the hidden person of the heart,” and also from the distraction and injustice of costly living while others are poor.

Support from Transcript:

  • Paul’s standard includes “modest apparel with propriety and moderation… not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing,” showing the issue is more than exposure.
  • Peter contrasts outward adorning with “the hidden person of the heart… a gentle and quiet spirit.”
  • Bercot says churches often “explain away” these passages “so that in the end they don’t mean anything.”
  • He highlights simplicity: early writers urge clothing that is “simple,” “plain,” “not expensive,” even “homemade,” and “clean and tidy.”
  • He notes dyed cloth was avoided because it signaled expense; today the “principle… is no different,” but what counts as costly has changed.
  • Wesley’s quote links costly apparel to less ability to “clothe the naked” and “feed the hungry,” calling needless spending effectively “stolen from God and from the poor.”
Discussion Follow-ups If “costly clothing” is about luxury and admiration, what current wardrobe choices function mainly as public status? How do you tell when something is simply good quality versus a “soft garment” luxury Jesus associated with “king’s courts”?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10
Back Questions Next