Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 5
Tertullian argues, “Since all passionate excitement is forbidden to us, we are barred from every kind of spectacle”; what do you think he means by “all passionate excitement,” and how would adopting that standard confront common evangelical ideas about Christian freedom, neutrality, and “it’s just entertainment”?
Another way to ask: What do you think Tertullian meant by “all passionate excitement” being wrong for Christians? If we took his view seriously, how would it challenge ideas like “Christian freedom” and “it’s just entertainment”?

Direct Answer In the transcript’s context, “all passionate excitement” seems to mean the heated, strife-filled emotional frenzy stirred up by spectacles—rage, arguments, and partisan zeal—which Tertullian says contradicts Christians being “consecrated to peace.” Adopting that would challenge the modern idea that entertainment is morally neutral as long as you personally “don’t do anything.”

Support from Transcript:

  • Tertullian: “Since all passionate excitement is forbidden to us, we are barred from every kind of spectacle.”
  • He explains why: spectators “fly into rages, passions, arguments.”
  • He says such conduct is what “they who are consecrated to peace should never indulge in.”
  • He criticizes the crowd’s speech: “curses and reproaches” and irrational hatred.
  • He asks whether someone can think of God while “there is eager strife there for a charioteer.”
  • Bercot links it to today by noting the description fits modern sports culture closely.
Discussion Follow-ups If entertainment regularly produces a heart posture opposite of peace, can Christians still defend it as “freedom,” or does the fruit reveal the problem?