Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
Jesus says the Kingdom doesn’t come “with observation” and is “within you,” and Bercot brings in Tertullian: “within your power…if you hear and do the commandments of God”; how does that early-Christian interpretation confront modern ideas of grace, assurance, and “faith without kingdom commitments,” and what commandments do you tend to reclassify as optional?
Another way to ask: Jesus said the Kingdom is “within you,” and Tertullian said it shows up when you hear and obey God’s commands. How does that challenge modern ideas about grace and assurance that don’t require Kingdom commitment, and which commands do you tend to treat as optional?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, Tertullian’s interpretation confronts the idea that someone can claim faith while avoiding obedience, because he links the kingdom being “within you” to “hear and do the commandments of God.” It pushes assurance toward concrete kingdom commitment—choosing citizenship by submitting to God’s commands—rather than treating the Kingdom as merely an invisible idea with no obligations.

Support from Transcript:

  • Jesus: “The Kingdom of God does not come with observation… for indeed the Kingdom of God is within you.”
  • Tertullian’s comment: “within you” means “in your hand or within your power… if you hear and do the commandments of God.”
  • Bercot concludes: “Anybody can choose to be a citizen… if he is willing to make the needed commitment.”
  • He stresses accessibility but also commitment: no need to “travel anywhere or pay any sum of money.”
  • He says many Christians “never make the kingdom commitments,” implying some separate “faith” from obedience.
  • The kingdom is “real” and has “real laws,” so “commandments” are not optional add-ons.
Discussion Follow-ups The transcript doesn’t list specific commandments here; which of Jesus’ commands do you personally treat as optional in practice? How does linking kingdom citizenship with obedience challenge common ways of talking about grace and assurance?