Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
The chapter opens by describing how Jews heard John’s announcement “the Kingdom of God was at hand” as Messiah, national independence, and Rome’s overthrow; what does that reveal about what they most wanted from God, and where do you see similar expectations shaping Christians’ hopes today?
Another way to ask: When many Jews heard “the Kingdom of God is near,” they thought it meant a Messiah who would free them from Rome. What does that show they wanted most from God, and where do Christians today expect God to fix their nation or politics in similar ways?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, many Jews mainly wanted God to change their political situation—bring a Messiah who would overthrow Rome and restore national independence. The transcript implies a similar temptation today when Christians expect God’s “kingdom” to look like visible social or political power rather than Jesus’ revolutionary kind of kingdom.

Support from Transcript:

  • John’s message “the Kingdom of God was at hand” meant to the Jews: “the Messiah was about to come… the overthrow of Rome… back their independence as a nation.”
  • They expected a Messiah who looked like a liberator: “He was obviously no warrior… didn’t even attempt to organize an army.”
  • Jesus’ kingdom is presented as unlike earthly kingdoms: “no earthly ruler… reigns from heaven… no military forces.”
  • The domain has “no national boundaries” and “no earthly capital or holy shrine.”
  • The kingdom’s presence isn’t mainly visible political change: “does not come with observation… the Kingdom of God is within you / in your midst.”
Discussion Follow-ups What kinds of outcomes do you tend to treat as proof that God is “winning” (control, influence, security)? How might that differ from Jesus’ description of a kingdom people often can’t even see?