Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 4
Bercot asks whether Jesus expanded divorce permission or narrowed it, and insists Jesus “almost completely shut it,” leaving a narrow exception for husbands—what are the strongest reasons you’ve heard (or held) for believing Jesus broadened divorce rights, and how does Bercot’s argument pressure-test those reasons?
Another way to ask: Do you think Jesus made divorce easier or harder to allow? What are your strongest reasons for thinking Jesus broadened divorce rights, and how does Bercot’s view test those reasons?

Direct Answer Bercot pressure-tests the common church assumption that Jesus “expanded” divorce by arguing the opposite: Jesus narrowed Moses’ permission and even removed the Mosaic allowance for remarriage. His critique targets the modern idea that both husband and wife now have equal permission to divorce for sexual immorality.

Support from Transcript:

  • He asks directly: was Jesus “expanding… or… narrowing” the law? He says, “he was narrowing it.”
  • Under Moses, divorce could occur for “some uncleanness,” but “Jesus allowed… only for sexual immorality.”
  • He states Jesus tightened further: Mosaic Law “permitted a divorced woman to remarry,” but Jesus forbade it: “Whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery.”
  • He calls it “incredibly strange” that “today's church teaches that Jesus expanded the law.”
  • He critiques the standard teaching: churches say both man and woman can divorce for sexual immorality, but “Did he expand… so that now wives could divorce their husbands? No.”
Discussion Follow-ups What makes the “Jesus broadened it” view feel obvious to many Christians? How does Bercot’s remarriage point affect your interpretation of what Jesus was doing?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10
Back Questions Next