Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 10
Near the end, Bercot claims miracles have “no probative value” for someone’s standing with Christ, yet “bogus miracles clearly prove” Christ is not behind that ministry because “Christ never works through corruption and deception”; how should that reshape the way you evaluate ministries that seem powerful, and what does it reveal about God’s character and priorities—that the “means” matter to Him as much as the “ends”?
Another way to ask: If miracles don’t prove someone is close to Christ, but fake miracles show Christ isn’t behind that ministry, how should that change how you judge “powerful” ministries? What does it say about God that the way things are done matters as much as the results?

Direct Answer Bercot teaches that impressive miracles should not be treated as proof of God’s approval, but deception is decisive evidence against a ministry; this reveals that God’s character is bound to truth, so corrupt methods can never be justified by successful outcomes.

Support from Transcript:

  • He anticipates “wonder workers” claiming spiritual power on Judgment Day: “have we not… done many wonders,” yet Jesus says, “I never knew you… you who practice lawlessness.”
  • His conclusion: “neither the absence nor presence of miracles has any probative value as to a person standing with Christ.”
  • He distinguishes real power from real character: “Genuine miracles have happened through authentic Christians, and genuine miracles have happened through artificial Christians.”
  • But he draws a strict limit: “no artificial miracle has ever been done through an authentic Christian.”
  • Therefore, “bogus miracles clearly prove that Christ is not behind that person's ministry.”
  • His theological reason is ethical: “Christ never works through corruption and deception,” matching his earlier claim that “the means… is just as important as the end.”
Discussion Follow-ups What tests should Christians apply to a ministry besides stories of power? How does prioritizing truth over results protect the church from being impressed by what Jesus may not endorse?