Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 9
Bercot parallels Eden—God speaks clearly, then the serpent contradicts—to modern Christians reading Jesus’ “plain, clear commandments” but choosing a preacher who contradicts Jesus; what are some uncomfortable commands of Jesus that believers most commonly explain away, and what motivates that impulse in the heart?
Another way to ask: Bercot compares Eden to today: God speaks clearly, but people choose a voice that contradicts Him. What are some hard commands of Jesus that Christians often explain away, and what heart reasons make that tempting?

Direct Answer The transcript’s main example of “uncomfortable commands” is simply Jesus having real commandments that still bind us; believers explain them away because, like Eve, they trust a more appealing voice that makes obedience feel unnecessary and preserves a “safe” version of grace.

Support from Transcript:

  • Eden pattern: God’s clear command (“you shall not eat…you shall surely die”) is contradicted by the serpent (“You will not surely die”).
  • He calls it an “easy test,” yet Adam and Eve failed—Eve believed the serpent; Adam didn’t stand up when his wife was wrong.
  • He applies it directly: “We read the plain, clear commandments of Jesus. Yet…when a preacher or Bible commentator directly contradicts Jesus, we choose to believe such a man.”
  • He describes the motive as attraction to a different god: the “popular Jesus…has no commandments…all grace,” never angry, never punishing sin.
  • He notes social reinforcement: many Christians “ignore or explain away Jesus’ teachings,” making disobedience feel normal.
Discussion Follow-ups The transcript does not list specific commands (like teachings from the Sermon on the Mount) by name in this chapter, so groups should supply examples. Which commands do you find yourself wishing were “not really what Jesus meant,” and why?