Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 7
The chapter interprets “the Kingdom of God is not in word but in power” to mean Spirit-empowered obedience rather than theological talk or even “wonders”; how does the warning about miracle-working “lawlessness” challenge modern Christian fascination with signs, spiritual gifts, platformed ministries, or testimonies of dramatic experiences?
Another way to ask: If “the Kingdom of God is not in word but in power” means Spirit-powered obedience (not just talk or even miracles), how does that challenge our obsession with signs, gifts, famous ministries, or dramatic testimonies? How does the warning about miracle-working “lawlessness” hit you?

Direct Answer Bercot’s warning challenges the idea that miracles, impressive ministries, or dramatic experiences prove someone is truly in Christ. The transcript says wonders can exist alongside “lawlessness,” so the real test is obedient life under Jesus’ Kingdom laws, not spiritual spectacle.

Support from Transcript:

  • Paul’s phrase is interpreted as: “The essence of the Kingdom isn’t words, theology, but power.”
  • Bercot clarifies Paul is not speaking of “the power to perform wonders,” because “Wonders are like words… by themselves, they prove nothing.”
  • Jesus’ warning is quoted: people who “prophesied… cast out demons… done many wonders” can still hear, “I never knew you… you who practice lawlessness.”
  • Bercot concludes these wonder-workers “lived their entire Christian life in a fantasy world,” thinking they had power not actually from Jesus.
  • The core issue is obedience: “His Kingdom has laws, and if we don’t obey his laws, then we practice lawlessness.”
Discussion Follow-ups How do we evaluate spiritual leaders—by platform or by obedience? What parts of our church culture reward “wonders” more than plain faithfulness to Jesus’ commands?