Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
The chapter quotes Wycliffe’s absolute predestination: “everything that will happen will happen of necessity… if Paul is foreknown as damned, he cannot truly repent”; what does that do to the meaning of repentance, warning passages, and obedience, and how would early Christians—who emphasized practical discipleship—have responded to a theology that seems to make moral change impossible for the damned?
Another way to ask: If everything is fixed ahead of time and some people can’t truly repent, what happens to the meaning of repentance, warnings, and obedience? How would early Christians who focused on daily discipleship react to a view that seems to make real change impossible for the condemned?

Direct Answer In Bercot’s presentation, Wycliffe’s absolute predestination makes repentance effectively impossible for the damned and turns human response into something fixed “of necessity,” which would drain urgency from warnings and obedience. The transcript doesn’t directly state how early Christians would respond, but it implies Kingdom-focused believers would object because they centered Christianity on practical, change-producing discipleship.

Support from Transcript:

  • Wycliffe taught persons are “unalterably predestined” to life or damnation “before” birth, not based on foreknowledge but God’s “arbitrary decree.”
  • He wrote: “Everything that will happen will happen of necessity,” and “if Paul is foreknown as damned, he cannot truly repent.”
  • Bercot notes this doctrine was typical: “virtually all Augustinian reformers taught absolute predestination as a major plank.”
  • He contrasts streams: Augustinian movements stressed theology, while Kingdom movements stressed “lifestyle,” suggesting repentance and obedience are central and meaningful.
  • The Lollards’ later move toward Kingdom emphases (Bible study, preaching, nonviolence) illustrates a practical discipleship direction rather than a deterministic one.
Discussion Follow-ups If repentance can’t occur for some people, what purpose do calls to repent serve? Even if the transcript doesn’t address it explicitly, how does a lifestyle-centered Christianity evaluate doctrines that seem to weaken moral responsibility?