Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Kingdom that Turned the World Upside Down  /  Chapter 30, The Alternate Stream  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 7
Wycliffe taught that neither clerics nor the Church should own property, yet he “had no problem with kings and the nobility storing up treasures on earth”; what does this reveal about how easy it is to apply Jesus’ wealth teachings selectively, and where are Christians today tempted to demand sacrifices from “religious institutions” while excusing the economic practices of the powerful (or ourselves)?
Another way to ask: What does it show about us when we apply Jesus’ warnings about wealth to church leaders but not to rich rulers—or ourselves? Where do Christians today demand sacrifice from churches while excusing the money habits of the powerful?

Direct Answer Bercot uses Wycliffe to show how reformers can sound radical on wealth but still apply Jesus’ teachings selectively—restricting them to church leaders while excusing the wealthy and powerful. The temptation is to aim Jesus’ hard sayings at “institutions” we dislike, not at ourselves or our political allies.

Support from Transcript:

  • Wycliffe “fiercely attacked the wealth of the Catholic Church” and taught that “neither clerics nor the Church should own any property at all.”
  • But Bercot says Wycliffe “was not ready to embrace the full teachings of Jesus against accumulating treasures on earth.”
  • Specifically, he “had no problem with kings and the nobility storing up treasures on earth,” showing a double standard.
  • He even advocated state coercion: if the Church wouldn’t hand over properties, “the crown should forcibly take them,” aligning his reform with the interests of the crown.
  • Wycliffe’s reform operated within “the power circles of England,” with noble protection—an environment where selective application would be socially convenient.
Discussion Follow-ups The transcript doesn’t address modern examples directly, but the principle applies: do we demand simplicity from pastors, churches, or ministries while excusing consumerism, hoarding, or luxury among “respectable” believers and leaders?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next