Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Kingdom that Turned the World Upside Down  /  Chapter 28, The Underground Kingdom  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 9
Pierre de Broyce taught that church buildings were an “extravagant waste,” rejected works “for the benefit of the dead,” opposed the Mass and repetitive prayers, and rejected veneration of the cross/images; which of these critiques feels most threatening to how Christians practice today, and why might simple Gospel reading have been so destabilizing?
Another way to ask: Pierre de Broyce criticized fancy church buildings, prayers for the dead, the Mass, repeated prayers, and honoring crosses and images. Which of these challenges feels most upsetting to Christians today, and why would simply reading the Gospels be so disruptive?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t rank which critique is most threatening today, but it shows Pierre’s message attacked the accepted religious system at multiple pressure points—money, rituals, and sacred objects—by redefining “church” as a spiritual community. Simple Gospel reading was destabilizing because it centered authority in Jesus’ words and exposed practices that didn’t match the Gospels.

Support from Transcript:

  • Pierre taught “church buildings were an extravagant waste” and that the Church “is a spiritual community that does not need buildings.”
  • He said “works done for the benefit of the dead are worthless.”
  • He preached “against the Roman Mass and repetitive prayers.”
  • He told hearers not to “venerate or worship the cross or images” and urged destruction of “articles of idolatry.”
  • Crucially, “Pierre read the four Gospels to his listeners and preached the authentic Kingdom of God.”
  • The movement was disruptive enough that followers “smashed altars and images… destroyed church buildings,” and Pierre was “eventually burned.”
Discussion Follow-ups Which practices today function like “markers” of church identity (buildings, rituals, symbols)? How do we test them against the Gospels without becoming destructive like Pierre’s non-nonresistant followers?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10
Back Questions Next