Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 2
David Bercot argues that Augustine’s debate method was to take a heresy that contained a partial truth (blue) and respond with the opposite partial truth (yellow) rather than calling people back to the apostolic “green”; where do you see this “opposite extreme” strategy operating in the chapter, and how might it still show up in the way Christians defend orthodoxy today?
Another way to ask: Where do you see Augustine answering one error by swinging to the opposite extreme instead of returning to the apostles’ teaching, and how do Christians still do that today when defending right belief?

Direct Answer Bercot shows Augustine repeatedly “winning” by swinging to the opposite extreme—especially on war and salvation—so that he preserves an argument but loses the balanced, apostolic “green.” The transcript suggests the same pattern can happen today when Christians refute error by overcorrecting into another distortion.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot’s model: heresy = “blue” (partial truth), apostolic doctrine = “green,” but Augustine argues for “yellow,” the opposite half-truth.
  • Example 1 (war/Old vs New): against Manicheans, Augustine denies the difference between Jesus and Moses: “Killing was just as lawful under the New as it was under the Old.”
  • He reinterprets Jesus’ commands so they don’t require literal obedience: “not a bodily action, but an inward disposition,” allowing killing while “loving.”
  • Example 2 (Pelagius): historic Christianity held grace is necessary and humans cooperate, but Augustine swings to “we humans have no power whatsoever to obey Christ…[God] arbitrarily chose who would be eternally saved and who…damned.”
  • Bercot says this method “overturned historic biblical Christianity” and was built by “proof-texting a few passages…then ignoring everything else.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you see Christians today answering legalism with “nothing matters,” or answering permissiveness with harsh control—rather than calling people back to Jesus’ full teaching?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10
Back Questions Next