Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 10
Bercot concludes God was not thwarted: Jesus “knew the Constantinian Hybrid was coming” and “has used it as a test” to expose those who don’t truly love His ways; how does that reinterpretation of church history confront your view of God’s sovereignty and the Church’s story, and what concrete loyalties (wealth, power, respectability, national identity) might that “test” be probing in you?
Another way to ask: If Jesus knew the Constantinian Hybrid would happen and used it as a test, how does that change how you see God’s control over church history? What loyalties in you (money, power, respectability, nation) might that test be uncovering?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, Bercot’s conclusion reframes the Constantinian turn not as God losing control but as something Jesus foresaw and allowed as a sorting test, revealing who truly loves Jesus’ ways versus who prefers a world-shaped kingdom. The transcript names the kinds of loyalties at stake—wealth, power, and empire-shaped respectability—even if it doesn’t list “national identity” explicitly.

Support from Transcript:

  • “Does this mean that God’s purpose had been thwarted?… Not at all.”
  • “The whole Constantinian Hybrid had happened just as God knew it would. It was all foretold in Jesus’ Kingdom teachings and parables.”
  • Mustard seed and leaven parables: the Kingdom would become expansive—large enough for “birds… [to] nest.”
  • Yet Jesus also said, “Narrow is the gate… and there are few who find it,” and “Do not fear, little flock.”
  • “The majority… would be weeded out in the end,” and Jesus “has used it as a test.”
  • The hybrid’s temptations included “worldly power and luxuries,” wealth accumulation, and state-backed force.
Discussion Follow-ups If God can use even major corruptions as a test, what should that do to our confidence in mere church size and cultural influence? Where are you most tempted to prefer a respected, powerful “empire church” over Jesus’ narrow way?