Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Kingdom that Turned the World Upside Down  /  Chapter 23, Was God Changing the Rules  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 1
The chapter claims church leaders in Constantine’s day “convinced themselves that God was changing all the rules”; what specific teachings does Bercot say they reclassified as belonging to “a different time,” and what does that reveal about how we decide which commands are permanent?
Another way to ask: Which teachings does Bercot say church leaders in Constantine’s time treated as “for a different time”? What does that show about how people decide which commands still apply today?

Direct Answer Bercot says they pushed aside Jesus’ teachings on non-resistance, loving enemies, and not being of the world as if those belonged to an earlier “paradigm.” That reveals a dangerous way of deciding permanence: letting historical success and political opportunity reinterpret commands that Jesus intended as ongoing kingdom laws.

Support from Transcript:

  • The leaders believed “God was changing all the rules,” so certain teachings “applied to a different time, a different paradigm.”
  • He names the teachings specifically: “non-resistance, loving one’s enemies, and not being of the world.”
  • Their reasoning leaned on appearances: “it seemed to most Christians that God was truly blessing the church through Constantine.”
  • Bercot answers permanence by appealing to Christ’s unchanging authority: “Jesus Christ is the same today, yesterday, and forever.”
  • He concludes, “Until He returns, there are not going to be any changes in the way His kingdom is run… [or] in His laws.”
Discussion Follow-ups What pressures today tempt Christians to label Jesus’ commands as “for another time”? What should count as the deciding authority—circumstances or Christ’s words?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next