Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
David Bercot argues that the early Church distinguished between “nature/substance” and “order/authority” in the Trinity; how does his analogy of the President and Vice President (and then husband and wife) shape what we think God is like, and where does it clarify—or potentially distort—Father-Son relationships?
Another way to ask: How does Bercot’s President/Vice President (and husband/wife) example shape how we picture God and the Trinity? Where does it help us understand the Father and Son, and where might it mislead us?

Direct Answer Bercot’s analogies aim to clarify that the Father and Son are fully equal in divine nature while still having a real hierarchy of authority (“order”). They help explain submission without inferiority, but they could potentially distort things if people treat human authority structures as a perfect map of the Trinity.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says to grasp historic teaching “a person has to understand the difference between nature and order.”
  • “Nature or substance refers to the essence… All humans are of the same nature… However, humans differ… as to order.”
  • Political analogy: “The President has authority over the Vice President. These two persons are the same in nature, but they differ in order.”
  • Applied to God: “The Church has always taught that the Father and the Son are of the same nature… Both… are equally divine… [yet] there is a difference of order or authority.”
  • Marriage analogy: “Just as there is a hierarchy of order between a husband and wife, there is a hierarchy of order within the Trinity.”
  • He warns “Equality of nature does not mean equality of order,” and misunderstanding this produces “a confused understanding of the Trinity.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where might political or marriage authority analogies help modern Christians, and where might they import worldly assumptions back into how we picture God?