Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Kingdom that Turned the World Upside Down  /  Chapter 21, What Happened to the Kingdom Gospel  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 10
In the Donatist controversy, state money and recognition raised the question of which bishop would get the salary, exemptions, and building—leading to appeals up to Constantine and setting a precedent for emperors to convene councils; how does this story challenge modern assumptions that state involvement is neutral or beneficial to the church, and what specific boundaries would need to exist today to keep “the wall between church and state” from crumbling inside our own congregations?
Another way to ask: How does the Donatist story show that government support can pull the church into power struggles? What clear limits would churches need today to keep government influence from slowly taking over inside the church?

Direct Answer Bercot’s account shows state involvement is not neutral: once the government funds and recognizes church leaders, it inevitably gets drawn into deciding church disputes and shaping church life. To keep the “wall” from crumbling, churches would need clear boundaries that keep state money, state oversight, and state adjudication out of internal church governance.

Support from Transcript:

  • The controversy became explosive because of state benefits: salary, tax exemptions, and control of a rebuilt building “at state expense.”
  • Government recognition initially chose Cecilian as bishop, giving him salary and exemptions—creating immediate injustice claims.
  • The Donatists appealed to the proconsul, then Constantine; Constantine appointed the bishop of Rome, then a council at Arles, then personally ruled.
  • Bercot states the significance plainly: it “set the precedent for the Roman emperor to convene church councils and even to personally adjudicate church matters.”
  • Conclusion: “The wall between church and state had largely crumbled,” and Christians mixed “the affairs of God’s kingdom with the affairs of this world.”
  • Constantine later viewed himself as “bishop” and even “universal bishop,” illustrating how quickly rulers assume spiritual authority.
Discussion Follow-ups What practical policies would prevent government funding or political favor from determining who leads, what is taught, or how disputes are settled?

Jumpstarter 10 of 10
Back Questions Done