Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 1
David Bercot insists his teaching on war, non-resistance, and government is not a private interpretation but “the historical position of the Christian Church” until Constantine; what would it require for you to treat “universal or near-universal” early Christian testimony as weighty evidence for Christian discipleship today?
Another way to ask: Bercot says almost all Christians before Constantine agreed about war, non-resistance, and government. What would you need to see to treat that early agreement as strong guidance for following Jesus today?

Direct Answer It would require taking seriously Bercot’s claim that the earliest post-apostolic Christians understood Jesus’ commands in a consistent, lived way, and being willing to let that “closest to the apostles” witness challenge modern assumptions. Based on his teaching, the weight comes from the breadth and unanimity of testimony before Constantine, not from one author’s opinion.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says these views on “war, non-resistance, and government” were “the original teachings of the Church” and “universal or near-universal…until the time of Constantine.”
  • He stresses it is “not… the personal viewpoint of David Berceau,” and rejects the idea of being the lone correct interpreter.
  • He invites verification: “I don’t want you to take my word…hear this right from the horse’s mouth.”
  • He claims he did not cherry-pick: “not special proof text quotations… [not] carefully selected.”
  • He frames the early Christians as “strangers and foreign residents,” living by “kingdom values” and treating “public affairs…essentially irrelevant.”
Discussion Follow-ups If early Christian consensus is strong, how much authority should it have alongside your current traditions? What would you need to see to be convinced it reflects faithful obedience to Jesus rather than a temporary cultural reaction?