Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 2
He asks whether Jesus tried to “Christianize the world,” pointing to Jesus before Pilate and the lack of New Testament efforts to end Roman capital punishment and torture; how do those examples challenge the way you measure faithfulness in the public square?
Another way to ask: Jesus didn’t try to take over Rome or end its punishments—how does that change what you think “being faithful” should look like in public life?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests these examples challenge the idea that faithfulness is proven mainly by public political reform efforts. Bercot points out that neither Jesus nor the early Christians focused on correcting Rome’s social evils through activism, which pushes us to measure faithfulness more by loyalty to Jesus’ kingdom than by public influence.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot asks directly: “But did Jesus try to Christianize the world?”
  • He points to Jesus’ trial: “When Jesus stood before Pilate, did he lecture Pilate about various social wrongs within the Roman Empire?”
  • He presses the early church example: “Did the New Testament Christians work to end capital punishment and torture throughout the Roman Empire?”
  • He states Jesus “didn’t come to preach a message about changing the governments and kingdoms of this world.”
  • He says Jesus’ aim was personal: “He sought to transform individuals.”
  • He frames kingdom identity: “They know that God’s kingdom is not of this world.”
Discussion Follow-ups If Jesus didn’t make confronting Pilate’s policies the center of his mission, what kinds of “public square” actions might be optional rather than essential? How might your definition of faithfulness change?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10
Back Questions Next