Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 9
The hosts describe congregational life as “autonomous but accountable,” “Catholic (small c) but congregational,” and they cite Irenaeus’ practice of consulting apostolic-founded churches for help without granting them command authority; what concrete structures (relationships with sister churches, outside counsel, shared standards) would your church need to develop to become truly accountable without importing hierarchy?
Another way to ask: If churches should be independent but still accountable, what real practices would help your church do that? What relationships or outside counsel could you build without creating a strict hierarchy?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, accountability without hierarchy looks like deliberate sister-church relationships, shared consultation in hard cases, and recognized outside counsel in major decisions (like ordinations), while still keeping authority in the local congregation. It’s “autonomous” in governance but “accountable” through real, ongoing connectedness.

Support from Transcript:

  • Daniel uses the framework: “autonomous, but yet accountable… Catholic… but congregational.”
  • He says congregational “doesn’t mean independent, not listening to anybody.”
  • David cites Irenaeus: if unsure, churches would consult apostolic-founded churches “to see what their practice is,” “not because they have authority to command us… but we want to do things right.”
  • Daniel gives a modern example: going to Greece to “ordain a brother,” bringing “another bishop” to participate—showing connection without claiming “pass on Apostolic Succession.”
  • David describes their practice: when ordaining elders, they “brought in the elders from our sister church,” to show “accountability…connectedness…laterally, horizontally.”
  • They emphasize being connected vertically to God and historically to “the church through all the centuries,” using early writings as “the best commentary” though “not…inspired.”
Discussion Follow-ups What sister churches or networks could your church meaningfully invite into major decisions? What written expectations (character, teaching, dispute resolution) could you share with them so accountability is real and not just symbolic?