Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
On Mary’s sinlessness, Bercot appeals to Romans 3:23 (“all have sinned”) and Mary’s Leviticus 12 sin offering (Luke 2); how do these texts—and his insistence that the early writers always name Jesus as the only exception—press on today’s Christian instincts about needing “special holy people” beyond Christ?
Another way to ask: Bercot uses Romans 3:23 and Mary’s offering in Luke 2 to argue Mary was not sinless, and says early Christians only treated Jesus as the exception. How does that push against the idea that we need extra “super holy” people besides Christ?

Direct Answer Bercot’s use of Romans 3:23 and Mary’s sin offering presses Christians to see Jesus as the only sinless exception and the sufficient focus for holiness and mercy, rather than seeking extra “special” sinless figures. The transcript frames the desire for additional exceptional people as unsupported by Scripture and early consensus.

Support from Transcript:

  • He states: “you will find no such teaching” of Mary’s sinlessness in the New Testament.
  • He cites Romans 3:23: “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,” stressing Paul makes “no exception… except Mary.”
  • He points to Luke 2: Mary brings “the sacrifice of two doves,” and he ties it to Leviticus 12: “this sacrifice was a sin offering,” asking why she’d offer it if sinless.
  • He summarizes: “Jesus alone was the one without sin. There are no exceptions made anywhere.”
  • He argues early writers reinforce this by explicitly naming Christ as the only exception (Clement: “Christ alone is sinless”; Tertullian: “to the Son of God alone… without sin”; Origen: “impossible for a human to be without sin… accept… Christ Jesus”; Cyprian: “No one is without stain… If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves”).
Discussion Follow-ups When you look for spiritual security, do you look for “more merciful” or “more approachable” figures than Christ? How does the idea “Christ alone is sinless” affect that instinct?