Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Claims of Rome and Eastern Orthodoxy  /  Images and Prayers to Saints  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 1
David Bercot describes his “solemn commitment” to never again be an “unthinking, unquestioning Christian” after leaving Jehovah’s Witnesses; what would that kind of commitment demand of us when we evaluate our own traditions—especially traditions we emotionally love or have built our identity around?
Another way to ask: Bercot vowed not to be an unthinking Christian again. What would that require when we look at traditions we love or that feel like part of who we are?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, this commitment demands that we test our traditions with honesty—listening to opposing claims, checking original sources, and being willing to change if the facts (Scripture and early Christian practice) don’t support what we love.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says he vowed “never, ever again be an unthinking, unquestioning Christian,” and not accept any group “without digging, searching.”
  • He refused to “automatically shut the door” even on groups that seemed “remote” to be right; he wanted to hear them “from their own mouths.”
  • He emphasizes “spiritual integrity…intellectual honesty,” being “honest about what the facts of history show,” even when it “gets me in hot water.”
  • He frames his purpose as “shine light” so people can make an “honest examination of our own church and our own beliefs.”
  • He admits early Christians were not “infallible,” but insists we must at least know “what they did believe and practice.”
Discussion Follow-ups What traditions would be hardest for you to re-check because they feel tied to family, identity, or nostalgia? What would “digging and searching” look like in a practical plan?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next