Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
In Bercot’s retelling of 1 Clement, the Corinthians removed leaders (some appointed by apostles) and installed new ones, yet Clement criticizes the lack of good cause rather than invalid orders; how does that reshape common assumptions about what early Christians believed God cared most about in church leadership—lineage, procedure, character, doctrine, peace, or something else?
Another way to ask: In 1 Clement, leaders are removed and replaced, and Clement focuses on the bad reasons rather than saying the new leaders are invalid—what does that show about what early Christians thought mattered most in leaders? Was it family line, proper process, character, sound teaching, peace, or something else?

Direct Answer Bercot’s retelling suggests Clement’s main concern was unjust removal and schism—orderly, humble, peaceable church life—rather than technical questions of “valid orders.” It pushes us to think early Christians prioritized blameless service, congregational consent, and avoiding disorder over lineage-based sacramental validity.

Support from Transcript:

  • Setting: Corinth dismissed leaders “some of whom had been appointed by the apostles,” chose “a whole new slate.”
  • Bercot expected Clement to argue the new leaders’ “ordination… would have been invalid,” but says “Clement never says a word” about deficiencies in ordination.
  • Clement does not say “their communion is no longer valid,” which Bercot says modern apostolic succession would require.
  • Clement’s stated criticism: “there had been no good reason to remove the previous leaders.”
  • In the quoted passage Clement praises those who “have blamelessly served the flock… in a humble, peaceful, and disinterested spirit” and says they “cannot be justly dismissed.”
  • Bercot says the letter’s focus is “remaining humble and not causing schisms… follow God’s order rather than doing things disorderly.”
Discussion Follow-ups If Clement’s focus is peace and justice, what should a church do when leaders are removed for personal power reasons? How might this shift how we weigh “procedure” versus spiritual and moral realities?