Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
Bercot quotes Paul (“let him be accursed”), Jude 3, and early writers like Tertullian and Irenaeus to argue the apostles had “perfect knowledge”; what assumptions about God’s wisdom and the Spirit’s guidance of the apostles are required for that view, and what modern Christian instincts does it challenge?
Another way to ask: Bercot says the apostles had “perfect knowledge,” using Paul, Jude 3, and early writers to support it. What does that assume about how God and the Holy Spirit guided the apostles, and what modern Christian habits does it push against?

Direct Answer The transcript assumes God, by Christ and the Spirit, gave the apostles a complete and reliable gospel message so nothing essential was missing that later leaders must “fix.” That challenges modern instincts that treat doctrine as something the church can progressively “develop” into a fuller form.

Support from Transcript:

  • He insists “the gospel is complete,” and that preaching “anything else” deserves the curse Paul mentions—implying God’s wisdom already delivered what was needed.
  • Jude’s “once for all delivered” is treated as meaning final and closed, not expandable.
  • He quotes Tertullian: the apostles “did not… choose to introduce anything new, but faithfully delivered… the teaching that they had received from Christ.”
  • He quotes Irenaeus opposing “improvers of the apostles,” saying the apostles had “perfect knowledge” and were “completely filled.”
  • He treats later modifications as “heresy… not development,” which presses against a mindset that expects later centuries to add binding truths.
Discussion Follow-ups What doctrines today are often defended as “development,” and how would Bercot’s standard force us to reassess them?