Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 8
Bercot says the Bible (including the Protestant 66) contains many unresolved historical/geographical/chronological difficulties (John vs. Synoptics chronology; “Dan” in Genesis 14; Judith and “Nineveh”), and he claims to affirm inerrancy without inventing answers; what kind of faith in God is he modeling here, and how does that contrast with the way modern Christians often connect “certainty” with “true spirituality”?
Another way to ask: What kind of trust in God is Bercot showing when he admits some Bible problems don’t have easy answers but still believes inerrancy? How is that different from the idea that real faith always means total certainty?

Direct Answer He models a faith that is both reverent and intellectually honest: he affirms Scripture’s “infallibility and inerrancy” while admitting real enigmas and refusing to “make answers up.” This contrasts with a mindset that treats having an explanation for every difficulty as proof of spirituality or orthodoxy.

Support from Transcript:

  • He criticizes a “sheltered spiritual world” where people assume the Bible has no difficulties.
  • He states plainly: “there are a lot of historical, scientific, and geographical difficulties in the Bible.”
  • He allows partial harmonizations: “we can offer plausible explanations for many… but… we really don’t know the answers” for quite a few.
  • He affirms his stance: “I believe in the infallibility and inerrancy of Scripture, including the Apocrypha.”
  • He refuses fabrication: “if I don’t have any credible answers… I don’t make answers up. But I do have faith that there are answers.”
  • He gives examples of unresolved issues: John vs. Synoptics chronology (“virtually impossible to reconcile… I honestly don’t know how”), “Dan” in Genesis 14, and Judith’s Nineveh reference (“Nobody knows… It’s definitely a difficulty. But I have faith that there is a solution.”).
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you feel pressure to have an immediate explanation for hard texts? How might Bercot’s approach help you separate trust in God from confidence in your own harmonizations?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next