Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 8
David argues the modern evangelical interpretation of Romans 8 arose first in Calvin and was driven by absolute predestination, and he says it “flatly contradicts Jesus” in John 14 and John 15 about abiding in Christ’s love by keeping commandments; how should a serious Christian weigh a beloved Protestant interpretive tradition against Jesus’ direct statements about obedience and love?
Another way to ask: If a popular Protestant reading of Romans 8 grew out of Calvin’s ideas about predestination, but Jesus says in John 14–15 we must obey to remain in His love, which should guide us more? How should Christians weigh church tradition against Jesus’ direct words?

Direct Answer According to David’s teaching, a serious Christian should not let a later interpretive tradition override Jesus’ explicit words; tradition must be tested by Scripture’s broader teaching and by the earliest church’s understanding. In this case, David says Calvin’s reading supports a system (absolute predestination) but clashes with Jesus’ repeated condition that we “abide” in His love through obedience.

Support from Transcript:

  • David claims the first commentator he found with the modern view is “John Calvin…mid-1500s,” and ties it to Calvin’s doctrine that “nothing we do can affect our salvation.”
  • He says later commentators “typically copies what previous commentators have said,” spreading the error.
  • He argues the modern interpretation is “illogical” and “unscriptural,” and “flatly contradicts Jesus Himself.”
  • He cites John 14:21,24: loving Jesus is shown by keeping commandments; “Whoever does not love me does not keep my words.”
  • He cites John 15:9–10: “Abide in my love. If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love.”
  • He adds Jude 1:21: “Keep yourselves in the love of God,” showing it is not automatic.
Discussion Follow-ups What does it look like to respect Reformers and commentaries while still letting Jesus’ direct teaching set the boundaries for how we read Paul?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next