Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 2
Hebrews 11:21 says Jacob worshiped “leaning on the top of his staff,” while Genesis 47:31 in the Masoretic has Jacob bowing “on the bed’s head”; how does Bercot’s use of this example challenge modern assumptions about inerrancy, and what would early Christians have done with such a discrepancy in public reading and preaching?
Another way to ask: Hebrews says Jacob worshiped while leaning on a staff, but Genesis in the Hebrew text says he bowed on the bed. How does Bercot use this to question modern ideas about inerrancy, and how do you think early Christians handled this when reading and preaching in church?

Direct Answer The transcript uses this “staff” vs “bed” example to challenge the modern assumption that the apostles always quoted a single, perfectly uniform Old Testament wording; Bercot’s point implies early Christians publicly read and preached from the Septuagint without being shaken by such differences.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says Hebrews 11:21 matches the Septuagint “exactly,” but Genesis 47:31 in the Masoretic reads “Israel bowed himself upon the bed’s head,” “instead of it being his staff.”
  • He frames these as clear cases where “it is obvious… the New Testament writer is quoting from the Septuagint, not the Masoretic Text.”
  • He explicitly rejects the idea that only one textual stream was uniquely God’s Word: “neither text had the exclusive claim of being God’s Word.”
  • He describes both traditions as “man’s imperfect copies of God’s Perfect Word,” which undercuts a simplistic “inerrancy requires identical wording everywhere” assumption.
  • He repeatedly notes the Church “embraced the Septuagint as their Old Testament,” indicating they would keep reading it in worship and teaching.
Discussion Follow-ups If early Christians could preach Christ from a Bible with these kinds of textual differences, what does that say about what “faithfulness to Scripture” means in practice?