Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 5
When Bercot says we know “virtually nothing” about OT transmission for 1,200 years and that scribes did not copy perfectly, what fears does that expose in us about faith, certainty, and control—and what would it look like to trust God’s character rather than our ability to reconstruct a pristine textual pipeline?
Another way to ask: If we know very little about how the Old Testament was copied for 1,200 years, and scribes made mistakes, what fears does that bring up about faith and certainty? What would it look like to trust God’s character instead of needing a perfectly tracked copying history?

Direct Answer Bercot suggests this exposes how much we want certainty and control—wanting God’s Word to be preserved in a way that removes the need for trust. Trusting God’s character would mean resting in His providential preservation of the message and commandments even when we can’t map a flawless transmission history.

Support from Transcript:

  • He asks detailed transmission questions (who copied, who guarded, what happened at the Babylonian destruction) and concludes: “we don’t know… virtually nothing.”
  • He states copyists “didn’t copy them perfectly,” and there are “variations between all of the hand-copied manuscripts.”
  • He anticipates emotional impact: this may feel “startling… or even faith-shattering,” and he admits he “had to wrestle with it for a number of years.”
  • He says, “please don’t let it be” faith-shattering and urges believers not to be “intimidated” by manuscript variation.
  • He emphasizes God’s providence: differences in text families are “all minor,” and none affect “the overall message… or any of its commandments.”
Discussion Follow-ups When uncertainty about manuscripts bothers you, is it because you fear losing God’s message—or losing a sense of intellectual security?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10
Back Questions Next