Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 3

Bercot lists New Testament believers who owned homes (Peter, Martha and Mary, house-church hosts in Acts, etc.) and even mentions believers who owned slaves; how do these examples challenge modern assumptions that the earliest Christians were either uniformly poor or uniformly communistic, and what do they suggest about “leaving all” in the apostles’ minds?

Another way to ask: Bercot points out early Christians who owned homes, and even slaves. How does that challenge the idea that all early Christians were always poor or shared everything, and what does it mean for what “leave everything” meant to the apostles?

Direct Answer The transcript presents early Christians as sometimes owning property (and even slaves), while also being willing to sacrifice and share radically when needs arose. “Leaving all,” in the apostles’ minds, appears to mean leaving ownership as a master and putting everything under Jesus’ control, not necessarily having zero possessions.

Support from Transcript:

Peter says, “We have left all and followed you,” yet Bercot notes Peter “had a wife and home,” with ordinary household goods implied.
Jesus’ close friends “Martha and Mary, owned a house,” and “Jesus never told them they had to get rid of it.”
Acts references believers meeting “from house to house,” preaching “in every house,” and named homes like “the house of Mary” (John Mark’s mother).
Paul references churches meeting in homes, implying ongoing property ownership.
He adds that some NT Christians “owned slaves” (Eph 6; Col 4), showing the early church included householders, not only the destitute.

Discussion Follow-ups If early Christians could own homes yet still “leave all,” what modern patterns show whether our homes and goods serve the kingdom—or compete with it?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 3 of 10