Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 6

The chapter criticizes a common Christian definition of humility: “I abase myself because I’m sinful, so I depend on God”; how does the chapter distinguish between humility as a “theological doctrine” and humility as a “quality of the heart,” and where do you see evangelical Christianity confusing the two?

Another way to ask: How does the chapter separate humility as an idea you believe from humility as a heart attitude you live out? Where do you see evangelical Christianity mixing those two up?

Direct Answer Bercot distinguishes doctrinal humility (agreeing mentally that you are sinful and need God) from real humility (a heart posture of lowliness that shows up when you are confronted, corrected, or asked to change).

Support from Transcript:

He summarizes a common definition: a person “abases himself because he realizes his sinfulness…depend[s] on God,” and says “Millions…meet that definition,” yet it can be only “mental assent.”
He calls it “merely a theological doctrine…It has little to do with true godly humility.”
Key line: “True godly humility is a quality of the heart, not a theological doctrine.”
Brother Phil’s congregation “testify that they acknowledge their own sinfulness,” but their reactions show that “holding to such doctrines has nothing to do with real humility.”
Diagnostic test: “How we respond when someone talks to us about specific sins in our lives reveals how much humility we really have.”

Discussion Follow-ups In your circles, what gets praised more: strong statements about depravity and grace, or a teachable spirit that accepts correction without resentment?

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 6 of 10