Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 1

In the Wilbert Flintwinch story, why does the “pack of sugar” detail feel so outrageous, and what does Bercot want that outrage to expose about how we weigh offenses against us compared to our offenses against God?

Another way to ask: Why does the “pack of sugar” part feel so shocking in the story? What does Bercot want that shock to show about how we judge small wrongs done to us compared to our sins against God?

Direct Answer The sugar packet feels outrageous because firing a man over something so small seems wildly unfair. Bercot wants that outrage to expose how absurdly we treat small wrongs against us as if they are huge, while forgetting that our sins against God are far greater.

Support from Transcript:

Wilbert stole “nearly a million dollars” over “nearly ten years,” yet begged for mercy and received forgiveness.
After being forgiven, Wilbert fires Fernando for taking “a pack of sugar,” calling it “employee theft” with “a firm, no-exceptions policy.”
Bercot comments, “Too implausible… ‘That could never happen in real life.’ ‘Oh, but it does.’”
He interprets the point: “Whatever others have done to us is like taking a pack of sugar in comparison to what we’ve done to God.”
He adds that refusing to forgive is “exactly how absurdly and how wickedly we act when we refuse to forgive others.”

Discussion Follow-ups What “packs of sugar” do you treat as unforgivable? What might it look like to measure others’ offenses in light of what God has already forgiven you?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 1 of 10