Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Secrets of the Kingdom Life  /  Chapter 15: The Lords Pig  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 1
Joe Williams promised to donate “one of the sow’s offspring to the Lord,” but when the stillborn piglet appeared, he concluded, “The Lord’s Pig died”; what does that reaction expose about how people can technically keep a vow while protecting what they most want to keep for themselves?
Another way to ask: What does Joe’s reaction show about how someone can “keep” a promise to God on paper while still holding on to what they really want to keep?

Direct Answer Joe’s reaction shows how a person can appear to honor a promise to God while subtly arranging things so the “cost” lands on God’s portion, not their own. He was emotionally attached to keeping the best outcome for himself, even if it meant the Lord’s share became the loss.

Support from Transcript:

  • Joe publicly pledged: if the sow recovered, “they would donate one of the sow’s offspring to the Lord… ‘the Lord’s Pig.’”
  • When one piglet was stillborn, Joe immediately interpreted it as God’s portion: “The Lord’s Pig died!”
  • His wording implies he had already mentally marked one pig as “the Lord’s,” and was relieved (or at least redirected his grief) that the sacrifice fell there.
  • Bercot initially read it as hypocrisy: “What a hypocrite… Surely I would never make a commitment to God and then renege on it.”
  • Later Bercot realizes the deeper pattern: when pressure comes, “Somehow, it was always the Lord’s Pig that died.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do we leave ourselves “wiggle room” in commitments to God so that, in practice, we protect what we most want?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next