Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Secrets of the Kingdom Life  /  Chapter 19: Sammy Slick  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 3
David Bercot describes “Type 1 Christians” as those who keep the “big commandments” (adultery, murder, blasphemy, robbery) but feel comfortable ignoring “smaller commandments”; what are some “smaller commandments” Jesus gives that modern Christians commonly treat as optional, and what reasons do we give ourselves for that?
Another way to ask: What are some of Jesus’ “smaller” commands that many Christians today treat like optional, and what excuses do we use to justify ignoring them?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t list specific “smaller commandments” Jesus gave; it mainly describes the pattern: people obey what they think affects salvation, and ignore what they think they can “get away with.” The reasons given are fear-based motivation and boundary-calculating rather than love.

Support from Transcript:

  • Type 1 Christians “obey all the big commandments” and then “feel comfortable ignoring the smaller commandments.”
  • Their “primary motivation is fear of eternal punishment, not love of God and His commandments.”
  • Sammy Slick is the model: he violates rules he believes won’t lead to termination—“they’re not going to fire me over it.”
  • The chapter calls this playing the “salvation issue” game—treating commands as a minimum standard for avoiding punishment.
  • The deeper problem is “heart condition,” meaning the issue isn’t just which rules, but why we treat some as optional.
Discussion Follow-ups Even though the transcript doesn’t name the “smaller commandments,” can you identify areas where you say, “I know Jesus said it, but it’s not a salvation issue”? What would change if love, not self-protection, set the standard?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next