Jumpstarter 8 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 8

Francis de Sales’ language includes “renounced all willful sin forever” and “There is no longer any me or mine. Rather, my me is Jesus.”—what do those lines assume about the possibility of real change, and how does that collide with modern Christian normalizing of ongoing “pet sins,” private compromises, or a permanent double-life?

Another way to ask: What do Francis de Sales’ words assume about real change, like “renounced all willful sin forever” and “my me is Jesus”? How does that clash with treating “pet sins,” secret compromises, or a double-life as normal?

Direct Answer De Sales’ words assume real, decisive change is possible through consecration: a person can truly renounce “willful sin” and transfer ownership of self to Christ. That collides with any mindset that plans to keep a protected area of sin or a divided life.

Support from Transcript:

De Sales describes a turning point: “From here on, God will be the sole object of your thoughts.”
He states an absolute break: “You have forsaken, rejected, detested, and renounced all willful sin forever.”
He describes total consecration: “dedicated and consecrated your heart, body, and soul… to the service and love of God.”
Identity and ownership shift: “I am not my own. Whether I live or whether I die, I am the Lord’s.”
He intensifies it: “There is no longer any me or mine. Rather, my me is Jesus. My mine is his.”

Discussion Follow-ups Where do Christians today treat certain sins as “manageable” rather than renounceable? What would it look like to repeat, sincerely, “I am not my own” in the places you’re most tempted to compartmentalize?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 8 of 10