Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Bercot says Jesus has already told us the Judgment Day “exam questions” (feeding the hungry, etc.) and that Jesus will already know the answers before we stand before Him; how does that picture of judgment challenge common evangelical ideas about assurance, “no fear,” and what gets evaluated at the end?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Jesus already told us what He will judge (like feeding the hungry) and already knows our answers. How does that challenge common evangelical ideas about being “assured,” having “no fear,” and what matters at the end?

Direct Answer Bercot’s picture challenges the idea that final judgment ignores our actions; he portrays Judgment Day as evaluating whether our faith produced concrete mercy, so assurance can’t be separated from lived obedience.

Support from Transcript:

  • He states the “exam questions” directly: “Did you feed the hungry? Give drink to the thirsty? Clothe the naked? And visit those who were sick or imprisoned?”
  • He emphasizes accountability: “Jesus will already know whether or not we have done these things before we stand in front of Him.”
  • He contrasts this with a popular belief: Christians “decide that Jesus isn't going to judge us based on anything we have done.”
  • He rejects the slogan-level assurance that excludes action: the pamphlet says “there is nothing we can do to get into heaven,” which he says is only partly true.
  • His corrective ties assurance to persevering fruit: salvation is a “gift to those with a living faith who produce godly fruit,” and “a faith that produces no fruit is not saving faith.”
Discussion Follow-ups How would your sense of “peace” change if you truly believed Jesus will evaluate mercy to the needy? What kind of assurance does Bercot seem to allow—one rooted in “living faith” rather than mere claims?