Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 6
The chapter lists what Scripture reveals—God’s love, the invisible realm, spiritual dangers, “rights, privileges, and responsibilities,” enemies and how to defeat them, and “what we must do if we are to spend eternity with Him”; which of those categories do you tend to avoid or downplay, and what might that avoidance imply about what you want God to be like?
Another way to ask: Which parts of what the Bible says (God’s love, spiritual danger, responsibilities, enemies, eternity, etc.) do you tend to avoid? What might that show about the kind of God you prefer?

Direct Answer The transcript can’t identify which category you personally avoid, but Bercot implies that avoiding certain biblical emphases often reflects a desire to reshape God into a safer or less demanding version. If we downplay warnings, responsibilities, or what we “must do,” we may be resisting a God who gives commands because He “loves us” and intends to form Christ in us.

Support from Transcript:

  • Scripture shows “how much He loves us” and gives “insights into the invisible realm of heaven and the angels.”
  • “He warns us of spiritual dangers.”
  • He sets forth “rights, privileges, and responsibilities as citizens of His kingdom.”
  • He shows “who and what our enemies are and how we can defeat them.”
  • “He clarifies what we must do if we are to spend eternity with Him.”
  • We shouldn’t seek “a way around God’s laws,” but “embrace them…as fully as possible,” because His directives are given in love.
Discussion Follow-ups Which biblical themes make you most uncomfortable: warnings, duties, enemies, or eternity? How might that discomfort reveal what kind of God you’d prefer, versus who He says He is?