Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 10
The chapter argues that chapter/verse divisions and headings are human influences that shape interpretation, using 1 Corinthians 11 head coverings as an example; how might reading whole epistles “in one sitting” and ignoring headings expose places where you’ve been guided more by editorial structure or tradition than by context, and what one New Testament book or section (e.g., Sermon on the Mount; John 13–17) will you commit to read as a unified message this week?
Another way to ask: How might reading a whole New Testament letter straight through, without headings, change what you think it means? What one book or section will you read all at once this week as one connected message?

Direct Answer Reading whole epistles straight through (ignoring headings and numbers) helps you follow the author’s flow of thought and notice context, exposing interpretations you may have absorbed from editorial packaging rather than the text itself. The transcript invites a concrete commitment to read a unified section (like the Sermon on the Mount or John 13–17), but it doesn’t assign which one you personally will choose.

Support from Transcript:

  • “Man’s fallible influence is on every page…chapters, paragraphs, and verses…All those divisions are man-made.”
  • Chapter divisions: Stephen Langton (1227); verse divisions: Robert Stephanus (1555); headings added later.
  • Bereans had to read whole scrolls, which forced attention to “context.”
  • Example: 1 Cor. 11:1–16 head coverings are assumed “conduct in church” partly because grouped with Lord’s Supper in the same chapter.
  • Instruction: “read an entire book in one sitting…ignore all subheadings…chapter and verse divisions…follow the line of thought.”
  • For larger sections: read “the entire Sermon on the Mount” or John “13–17” in one reading.
Discussion Follow-ups Where have you assumed a passage’s setting or topic because of a heading? Choose one unified reading this week and then ask: what changes when I read it as one continuous argument?