Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 10
Bercot says the world doesn’t believe because it doesn’t see Christian love, then applies it pointedly to “non-resisting Christians” who can love enemies but not brothers who differ on theology or practice—calling this possibly “worse than the tax collectors”; where have you seen (or practiced) this selective love, and what would it require—relationally and doctrinally—to treat unity and affection as essential rather than optional?
Another way to ask: Where have you seen people love enemies but not fellow Christians who disagree with them? What would need to change in relationships and beliefs to treat unity and real affection as necessary, not optional?

Direct Answer Bercot’s point is that selective love—tolerating enemies while rejecting brothers over “incidentals”—destroys Christian witness and contradicts Jesus’ goal of oneness; treating unity as essential would require choosing love across disagreements and refusing bickering, condemnation, and bitterness within the church.

Support from Transcript:

  • Jesus links unity and belief: “that they all may be one… that the world may believe that You sent Me” (John 17:21).
  • Bercot says the world doesn’t believe partly because it “doesn’t see God’s love among professing Christians,” but sees “bickering and arguing.”
  • He lists severe historical examples: Christians “imprisoned, murder, torture, and burn alive other Christians over doctrinal disputes,” and “slaughter one another” over issues.
  • He targets “non-resisting Christians” who can “turn the other cheek” toward enemies but “find it difficult to love a brother or sister who holds different views.”
  • Matthew 5:46-48: even “tax collectors” greet “their own brethren”; refusing even that may make us “worse than the tax collectors.”
  • John Wesley’s observation reinforces the pattern: churches “anathematize each other… what wrath… bitterness… even where they agree in essentials and only differ in… incidentals.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would change if disagreements were handled with the goal Jesus prayed for—real oneness—rather than winning, labeling, or distancing?