Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 7

In discussing “the speck and the plank,” Bercot challenges the common interpretation that Jesus wants us to find specks as long as we first remove our planks; he suggests Jesus doesn’t want us “ever to be looking” for specks because we will “always have a plank” due to our deeper knowledge of our own sins. How does that reinterpretation confront the way you’ve been trained to do discernment, accountability, or “calling out” error?

Another way to ask: Bercot says Jesus may not want us looking for “specks” at all, because we always have a “plank” in ourselves. How does that challenge what you’ve been taught about discernment, accountability, or calling out error?

Direct Answer Bercot’s reinterpretation confronts “call-out” habits by saying Jesus is not encouraging us to hunt for minor faults at all; since we always know far more about our own sin, our attention should be mainly on repentance and humility rather than scrutinizing others.

Support from Transcript:

He notes a common reading: Jesus “only told us to first remove the plank…so we could see clearly to remove the speck.”
Bercot disagrees: “I think Jesus is saying He doesn’t want us ever to be looking at the speck…in our brother’s eye.”
His reason: “we will always have a plank…The plank is our own sins.”
He explains why it’s bigger: “Because we know far more about our own sins than we do about anyone else’s.”
He adds an outcome: if we were ever “entirely without sin,” we’d be “so full of love and humility we won’t even be thinking about other people’s faults.”

Discussion Follow-ups How might “discernment” look different if it began with assuming your knowledge of yourself is always more urgent than your knowledge of another’s flaws?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 7 of 10