Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
The chapter claims someone can “live by all of the standards established by a church or society and yet be disobedient to Christ”; what does that imply about God’s priorities in judging obedience, and where do you see the temptation in your own life to treat “approved” behavior as a substitute for Christ’s actual commands?
Another way to ask: What does it say about what God cares about if someone can follow all church or social rules but still disobey Jesus? Where are you tempted to think “approved” behavior is enough instead of obeying Jesus’ real commands?

Direct Answer It implies that God judges obedience by Christ’s actual commandments and the heart behind them, not merely by whether we fit a church’s approved behaviors. The temptation is to let “compliance” replace an “obedient love-faith relationship with Christ,” assuming we’re fine because we pass our group’s visible tests.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says standards “rarely cover all of God’s commandments,” so someone can obey them “and yet be disobedient to Christ.”
  • He warns that standards focus on externals, while Jesus named “justice, mercy, and faith,” and Bercot adds love is “even weightier.”
  • “Church standards can control our outward conduct, but only God can see what’s in our hearts.”
  • “We should never imagine that our standing with God is assured just because we comply with our church’s standards.”
  • The Yoders “perfectly obey their church’s standards” but their “hearts are far from the kingdom of God,” showing the danger of “approved” behavior.
Discussion Follow-ups Bercot doesn’t list modern examples of “approved” behavior, but his point invites self-examination: what do we treat as proof we’re spiritual while neglecting prayer, love, mercy, and obedience to Jesus’ fuller teachings?