Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 7

Bercot warns that Law “assumes the reader is already on the vine,” doesn’t address conversion much, and “doesn’t put enough emphasis on grace”; how does this push against common evangelical frameworks of assurance, grace, and obedience, and what do you think Bercot wants readers to do with a holiness-focused book that could be misused?

Another way to ask: Bercot warns that Law doesn’t talk much about conversion and doesn’t stress grace enough. How does that challenge common evangelical ideas about grace, assurance, and obedience, and how should readers handle a holiness-focused book that could be taken the wrong way?

Direct Answer Bercot’s warning implies that a holiness-focused book can be spiritually helpful for believers but dangerous if treated as a conversion manual or if its calls to obedience are separated from grace. He seems to want readers to use Law’s book as a challenge toward surrender while remembering it assumes genuine life “on the vine” and may under-emphasize grace.

Support from Transcript:

He cautions: “the author assumes that the reader is already on the vine.”
Therefore, “It’s not a book to give to an unconverted person. It doesn’t really address the need for conversion.”
He critiques balance: “in *A Serious Call*, William Law doesn’t put enough emphasis on grace. He does not omit it, but…could have emphasized it more.”
He notes Law’s later works include “a lot more about the new birth and the role of grace.”
He still strongly recommends the book for “progress toward a fully surrendered life,” suggesting its purpose is growth in obedience and devotion.

Discussion Follow-ups How do you keep calls to surrender from turning into self-powered religion? If a book presses obedience strongly, what safeguards help you read it as a believer who depends on grace rather than as someone trying to earn acceptance?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 7 of 10