Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 3
The chapter insists on “devotional reading rather than exegetical Bible study” during the devotional hour; what do you think Bercot is protecting (or trying to produce) by separating these, and where might modern Christians confuse “information about God” with “remaining in God’s presence”?
Another way to ask: Why do you think Bercot separates devotional reading from deep Bible study during a devotional hour? Where do Christians today mistake learning facts about God for actually spending time with God?

Direct Answer Bercot seems to be protecting a devotional hour that is relational and God-centered—“remaining in God’s presence”—rather than turning it into an academic exercise. He is trying to produce a listening, responsive heart that obeys, not merely a mind that collects biblical information.

Support from Transcript:

  • He explicitly says the devotional hour calls for “devotional reading rather than exegetical Bible study.”
  • Devotional reading is defined as “consciously remaining in God’s presence and letting Him speak to us through His Word.”
  • He calls it “interactive reading,” because it naturally includes prayer while reading.
  • The interaction is not just learning: “praising God,” “confessing disobedience,” “making commitments,” and “asking for the power” to obey.
  • He expects Scripture and classics to lead to “new resolutions,” “spiritual needs…just become aware,” and “sins we need to confess.”
Discussion Follow-ups When you read Scripture, do you mainly aim to master the text, or to be mastered by it? What would it look like to read fewer verses but respond more fully in prayer and obedience?