Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 8 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 8
Clement of Alexandria says the spiritual person who must spend time on sustenance “thinks himself defrauded, being diverted by business”; what assumptions about Christian identity and purpose are embedded in that early Christian statement, and why does it sound unrealistic—or compelling—to modern Christians?
Another way to ask: Clement says a spiritual person feels “cheated” when business pulls them away from spiritual purpose. What does that say about what Christians are for, and why might it sound unrealistic—or inspiring—today?

Direct Answer The statement assumes a Christian’s true identity is primarily “the spiritual man” whose main vocation is kingdom service, so time spent on mere sustenance feels like a loss compared to spiritual work. It sounds unrealistic to modern Christians because we often treat jobs as our primary calling, but compelling because it matches Bercot’s argument that kingdom service should come first.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says early Christians “never referred to their jobs and businesses as their vocations. Their vocation was serving God and His kingdom.”
  • Clement is quoted: if he spends “a small portion of time for his sustenance,” he “thinks himself defrauded, being diverted by business.”
  • The quote implies sustenance work is necessary (“through the necessity of life”) but secondary.
  • Bercot’s broader frame: we have “a real job to do here on earth,” and many neglect it for “Monopoly money.”
  • His clarification about work: jobs are not condemned, but must not become “the central focus of our energy.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would have to be true about the kingdom for Clement’s attitude to feel normal? In what ways have modern Christians reversed the proportions—treating spiritual work as the “small portion”?