Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 10

The chapter ends by raising Jesus’ command to the rich young ruler to “give to the poor,” asking, “Surely it’s not a salvation issue. Or is it?” What would it do to your theology of grace, faith, assurance, and obedience if giving to the poor really is tied to salvation in a serious way?

Another way to ask: Jesus told the rich young ruler to give to the poor, and the chapter asks if that could be a salvation issue. If giving to the poor really is strongly tied to salvation, how would that change how you think about grace, faith, assurance, and obedience?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t answer the question fully, but it clearly pushes readers to reconsider whether generosity to the poor is optional, suggesting it may be deeply connected to genuine kingdom life and possibly to salvation. If it is tied to salvation, then grace and faith could not be treated as passive or “dormant,” and assurance would be tested by obedient, kingdom-focused living.

Support from Transcript:

He returns to the rich young ruler: Jesus said not only “sell what he had,” but also “give to the poor.”
He frames the tension directly: “But is giving to the poor really that important? Surely it’s not a salvation issue. Or is it?”
Earlier he quotes Menno Simons: “True evangelical faith… cannot lay dormant. It clothes the naked, feeds the hungry…” linking real faith with active mercy.
The chapter’s theme: possessions become “Monopoly money” at death, so kingdom service (including caring for needy people) is the “real job.”
He lists kingdom work beginning with acts of mercy (feeding, drink, shelter, clothing), implying these are central.

Discussion Follow-ups If “true faith cannot lay dormant,” what does that imply about a life with little concern for the poor? How might this challenge a view of assurance that is disconnected from concrete obedience?

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 10 of 10