Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 1

David Bercot says that “many, if not most, Christians are basically Andy Dimwits”; what parts of the “Monopoly money” illustration feel uncomfortably close to your own life, and what parts do you instinctively want to argue with or qualify?

Another way to ask: Bercot says many Christians are like “Andy Dimwits.” Which parts of the “Monopoly money” story hit close to home for you, and which parts do you want to push back on or add limits to?

Direct Answer Bercot’s point is that it’s easy for Christians to spend their lives chasing things that will be worthless to them at death, while neglecting the “real job” of kingdom work. If you want to argue with it, the main “qualification” he allows is that possessions can help heirs and that Christians should work to provide for their families—yet that still must not become the center.

Support from Transcript:

He says “many, if not most, Christians are basically Andy Dimwits,” implying we commonly live foolishly by kingdom standards.
“The instant we die, all of the money we’ve accumulated on earth turns into Monopoly money… The game is over. Forever.”
“Most of us are so busy gaining Monopoly money and plastic houses that we neglect the real job.”
Qualification: “Of course, these possessions benefit our heirs, but they are of no more use to us.”
Another qualification: “Am I suggesting… a Christian shouldn’t have a job? Not at all,” and he cites Paul that believers should “work… that we might not be a burden.”

Discussion Follow-ups What signs in your life show “the real job” is being neglected? Where have you used “providing for my family” as a reason to keep playing the Monopoly game?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 1 of 10